Browse by Title   
2 books by Alexander, Gregory S.
Sort by     
 

Commodity & Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970
Gregory S. Alexander
University of Chicago Press, 1997
Library of Congress KF562.A43 1997 | Dewey Decimal 330.17

Most people understand property as something that is owned, a means of creating individual wealth. But in Commodity and Propriety, the first full-length history of the meaning of property, Gregory Alexander uncovers in American legal writing a competing vision of property that has existed alongside the traditional conception. Property, Alexander argues, has also been understood as proprietary, a mechanism for creating and maintaining a properly ordered society. This view of property has even operated in periods—such as the second half of the nineteenth century—when market forces seemed to dominate social and legal relationships.

In demonstrating how the understanding of property as a private basis for the public good has competed with the better-known market-oriented conception, Alexander radically rewrites the history of property, with significant implications for current political debates and recent Supreme Court decisions.
Expand Description

The Global Debate over Constitutional Property: Lessons for American Takings Jurisprudence
Gregory S. Alexander
University of Chicago Press, 2006
Library of Congress K721.5.A44 2006 | Dewey Decimal 343.0252

Countries around the world are heatedly debating whether property should be a constitutional right. But American lawyers have largely ignored this debate, which is divided into two clear camps: those who believe making property a constitutional right undermines democracy by fostering inequality, and those who believe it provides the security necessary to make democracy possible. In The Global Debate over Constitutional Property, Gregory Alexander recasts this discussion, arguing that both sides overlook a key problem: that constitutional protection, or lack thereof, has little bearing on how a society actually treats property.

A society’s traditions and culture, Alexander argues, have a much greater effect on property rights. Laws must aim, then, to change cultural ideas of property, rather than deem whether one has the right to own it. Ultimately, Alexander builds a strong case for improving American takings law by borrowing features from the laws of other countries—particularly those laws based on the idea that owning property not only confers rights, but also entails responsibilities to society as a whole.
Expand Description

READERS
Browse our collection.

PUBLISHERS
See BiblioVault's publisher services.

STUDENT SERVICES
Files for college accessibility offices.


SEARCH

ADVANCED SEARCH

BROWSE

by TOPIC
  • by BISAC SUBJECT
  • by LOC SUBJECT
by TITLE
by AUTHOR
by PUBLISHER
WANDER
RANDOM TOPIC
ABOUT BIBLIOVAULT
EBOOK FULFILLMENT
CONTACT US

More to explore...
Recently published by academic presses

                   


home | accessibility | search | about | contact us

BiblioVault ® 2001 - 2023
The University of Chicago Press

BiblioVault A SCHOLARLY BOOK REPOSITORY
Results
  • PUBLISHER LOGIN
  • ADVANCED SEARCH
  • BROWSE BY TOPIC
  • BROWSE BY TITLE
  • BROWSE BY AUTHOR
  • BROWSE BY PUBLISHER
  • ABOUT BIBLIOVAULT
  • EBOOK FULFILLMENT
  • CONTACT US
2 books by Alexander, Gregory S.
Commodity & Propriety
Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970
Gregory S. Alexander
University of Chicago Press, 1997
Most people understand property as something that is owned, a means of creating individual wealth. But in Commodity and Propriety, the first full-length history of the meaning of property, Gregory Alexander uncovers in American legal writing a competing vision of property that has existed alongside the traditional conception. Property, Alexander argues, has also been understood as proprietary, a mechanism for creating and maintaining a properly ordered society. This view of property has even operated in periods—such as the second half of the nineteenth century—when market forces seemed to dominate social and legal relationships.

In demonstrating how the understanding of property as a private basis for the public good has competed with the better-known market-oriented conception, Alexander radically rewrites the history of property, with significant implications for current political debates and recent Supreme Court decisions.
[more]

The Global Debate over Constitutional Property
Lessons for American Takings Jurisprudence
Gregory S. Alexander
University of Chicago Press, 2006
Countries around the world are heatedly debating whether property should be a constitutional right. But American lawyers have largely ignored this debate, which is divided into two clear camps: those who believe making property a constitutional right undermines democracy by fostering inequality, and those who believe it provides the security necessary to make democracy possible. In The Global Debate over Constitutional Property, Gregory Alexander recasts this discussion, arguing that both sides overlook a key problem: that constitutional protection, or lack thereof, has little bearing on how a society actually treats property.

A society’s traditions and culture, Alexander argues, have a much greater effect on property rights. Laws must aim, then, to change cultural ideas of property, rather than deem whether one has the right to own it. Ultimately, Alexander builds a strong case for improving American takings law by borrowing features from the laws of other countries—particularly those laws based on the idea that owning property not only confers rights, but also entails responsibilities to society as a whole.
[more]




home | accessibility | search | about | contact us

BiblioVault ® 2001 - 2023
The University of Chicago Press