University of Alabama Press, 2005 Paper: 978-0-8173-5782-5 | Cloth: 978-0-8173-1441-5 | eISBN: 978-0-8173-8761-7 Library of Congress Classification BC199.A26W35 2004 Dewey Decimal Classification 160
ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | REVIEWS | TOC
ABOUT THIS BOOK
A study of the role of abductive inference in everyday argumentation and legal evidence
Examines three areas in which abductive reasoning is especially important: medicine, science, and law. The reader is introduced to abduction and shown how it has evolved historically into the framework of conventional wisdom in logic. Discussions draw upon recent techniques used in artificial intelligence, particularly in the areas of multi-agent systems and plan recognition, to develop a dialogue model of explanation. Cases of causal explanations in law are analyzed using abductive reasoning, and all the components are finally brought together to build a new account of abductive reasoning.
By clarifying the notion of abduction as a common and significant type of reasoning in everyday argumentation, Abductive Reasoning will be useful to scholars and students in many fields, including argumentation, computing and artificial intelligence, psychology and cognitive science, law, philosophy, linguistics, and speech communication and rhetoric.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
Douglas Walton has published 33 books including Legal Argumentation and Evidence, One Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias, Ad Hominem Arguments, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, and A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.
REVIEWS
“Abductive Reasoning makes a significant and original contribution. It is interdisciplinary in the right way: the drawing together of fields is demanded by the nature of the problem and issues, not by ideology or administrative decree.” —Jonathan E. Adler, author of Belief's Own Ethics
— -
“Walton’s book is a good account of abductive reasoning, especially in the field of witness testimony, or argument from expert opinion.”
—Artificial Intelligence and Law
— -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1
Abductive, Presumptive, and Plausible Arguments
Abductive Inference
Peirce on the Three Types of Reasoning
Peirce on the Form of Abductive Inference
Scientific Discovery and Artificial Intelligence
Abductive Inference in Legal Evidence
Defeasible, Plausible, and Presumptive Reasoning
Tentative Definitions
Argumentation Schemes
Araucaria as a Tool for Argument Diagramming
2
A Dialogue Model of Explanation
Types of Explanation
Models of Scientific Explanation
Simulation, Understanding, and Making Sense
Scripts, Anchored Narratives, and Implicatures
The Dialogue Model of Explanation
The Speech Act of Explanation
Dialogue Models of Scientific Argumentation and Explanation
Examination Dialogue and Shared Understanding
Dialectical Shifts and Embeddings
3
A Procedural Model of Rationality
Computational Dialectics
Reasoning as Chaining of Inferences
Forward and Backward Chaining Rule-Based Systems in Artificial Intelligence
The Problem of Enthymemes
Multiagent Practical Reasoning
Bounded Rationality
4
Defeasible Modus Ponens Arguments
A Typical Case of Abductive Reasoning in Evidence Law
Argumentation from Consequences
Defeasible Inferences and Modus Ponens
Conditionals and Generalizations
Abductive Inference in Medical Diagnosis
Introducing Defeasible Modus Ponens
Using Defeasible Modus Ponens as an Argumentation Scheme
5
Abductive Causal Reasoning
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Forms of Causal Argumentation
Argument from Correlation to Cause
Abductive Causal Reasoning in Law
Causal Abduction in Medical Examination and Diagnosis
Causal Reasoning as Dynamic Improvement of a Hypothesis
The Thesis That Causal Reasoning Is Abductive
Causal Explanations
The Chain of Reasoning in the Accident Case
Insights into Causal Argumentation Yielded by the Abductive Theory
6
Query-Driven Abductive Reasoning
Argument Extrapolation by Chaining Forward
Colligation in Chaining Backward
The Form of Abductive Inference Revisited
Belief-Desire-Intention and Commitment Models
The Abductive Profile of Dialogue
Abduction as a Query-Driven Process
Discovery as an Open Process
Retraction of Commitment
The Four Phases of Abductive Reasoning
7
Unsolved Problems of Abduction
Abduction and Argumentation Schemes
Enthymemes, Argumentation Schemes, and the Defeasible Modus Ponens Form of Reasoning
The Role of Examination in Science
Accounts and Explanations
The Problem of Inconsistency
How Abductive Reasoning Moves Forward by Examining Competing Accounts
Question-Answering and Critiquing Systems in Artificial Intelligence
University of Alabama Press, 2005 Paper: 978-0-8173-5782-5 Cloth: 978-0-8173-1441-5 eISBN: 978-0-8173-8761-7
A study of the role of abductive inference in everyday argumentation and legal evidence
Examines three areas in which abductive reasoning is especially important: medicine, science, and law. The reader is introduced to abduction and shown how it has evolved historically into the framework of conventional wisdom in logic. Discussions draw upon recent techniques used in artificial intelligence, particularly in the areas of multi-agent systems and plan recognition, to develop a dialogue model of explanation. Cases of causal explanations in law are analyzed using abductive reasoning, and all the components are finally brought together to build a new account of abductive reasoning.
By clarifying the notion of abduction as a common and significant type of reasoning in everyday argumentation, Abductive Reasoning will be useful to scholars and students in many fields, including argumentation, computing and artificial intelligence, psychology and cognitive science, law, philosophy, linguistics, and speech communication and rhetoric.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
Douglas Walton has published 33 books including Legal Argumentation and Evidence, One Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias, Ad Hominem Arguments, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, and A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.
REVIEWS
“Abductive Reasoning makes a significant and original contribution. It is interdisciplinary in the right way: the drawing together of fields is demanded by the nature of the problem and issues, not by ideology or administrative decree.” —Jonathan E. Adler, author of Belief's Own Ethics
— -
“Walton’s book is a good account of abductive reasoning, especially in the field of witness testimony, or argument from expert opinion.”
—Artificial Intelligence and Law
— -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1
Abductive, Presumptive, and Plausible Arguments
Abductive Inference
Peirce on the Three Types of Reasoning
Peirce on the Form of Abductive Inference
Scientific Discovery and Artificial Intelligence
Abductive Inference in Legal Evidence
Defeasible, Plausible, and Presumptive Reasoning
Tentative Definitions
Argumentation Schemes
Araucaria as a Tool for Argument Diagramming
2
A Dialogue Model of Explanation
Types of Explanation
Models of Scientific Explanation
Simulation, Understanding, and Making Sense
Scripts, Anchored Narratives, and Implicatures
The Dialogue Model of Explanation
The Speech Act of Explanation
Dialogue Models of Scientific Argumentation and Explanation
Examination Dialogue and Shared Understanding
Dialectical Shifts and Embeddings
3
A Procedural Model of Rationality
Computational Dialectics
Reasoning as Chaining of Inferences
Forward and Backward Chaining Rule-Based Systems in Artificial Intelligence
The Problem of Enthymemes
Multiagent Practical Reasoning
Bounded Rationality
4
Defeasible Modus Ponens Arguments
A Typical Case of Abductive Reasoning in Evidence Law
Argumentation from Consequences
Defeasible Inferences and Modus Ponens
Conditionals and Generalizations
Abductive Inference in Medical Diagnosis
Introducing Defeasible Modus Ponens
Using Defeasible Modus Ponens as an Argumentation Scheme
5
Abductive Causal Reasoning
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Forms of Causal Argumentation
Argument from Correlation to Cause
Abductive Causal Reasoning in Law
Causal Abduction in Medical Examination and Diagnosis
Causal Reasoning as Dynamic Improvement of a Hypothesis
The Thesis That Causal Reasoning Is Abductive
Causal Explanations
The Chain of Reasoning in the Accident Case
Insights into Causal Argumentation Yielded by the Abductive Theory
6
Query-Driven Abductive Reasoning
Argument Extrapolation by Chaining Forward
Colligation in Chaining Backward
The Form of Abductive Inference Revisited
Belief-Desire-Intention and Commitment Models
The Abductive Profile of Dialogue
Abduction as a Query-Driven Process
Discovery as an Open Process
Retraction of Commitment
The Four Phases of Abductive Reasoning
7
Unsolved Problems of Abduction
Abduction and Argumentation Schemes
Enthymemes, Argumentation Schemes, and the Defeasible Modus Ponens Form of Reasoning
The Role of Examination in Science
Accounts and Explanations
The Problem of Inconsistency
How Abductive Reasoning Moves Forward by Examining Competing Accounts
Question-Answering and Critiquing Systems in Artificial Intelligence
Summary of Abduction as a Heuristic
Notes
References
Index
ABOUT THIS BOOK | AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY | REVIEWS | TOC