|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Origins of Analytical Philosophy
Harvard University Press, 1994 Cloth: 978-0-674-64472-4 | Paper: 978-0-674-64473-1 Library of Congress Classification B808.5.D86 1994 Dewey Decimal Classification 146.4
ABOUT THIS BOOK | REVIEWS | TOC
ABOUT THIS BOOK
For half a century analytical philosophy has dominated professional philosophy in English-speaking countries. When contrasted with "Continental" philosophy, analytical philosophy is often called "Anglo-American." Michael Dummett argues that this is a misnomer: "Anglo-Austrian" would be a more accurate label, for analytical philosophy arose in the same milieu as the principal rival school of phenomenology. Furthermore, the two schools have the same roots. By reexamining the similar origins of the two traditions, we can come to understand why they later diverged so widely, and thus take the first step toward reconciliation. See other books on: Analysis (Philosophy) | Dummett, Michael | Origins | Phenomenology | Philosophy See other titles from Harvard University Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nearby on shelf for Philosophy (General) / By period / Modern:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Origins of Analytical Philosophy
ABOUT THIS BOOK | REVIEWS | TOC
Harvard University Press, 1994
Cloth: 978-0-674-64472-4
Paper: 978-0-674-64473-1
Cloth: 978-0-674-64472-4
Paper: 978-0-674-64473-1
For half a century analytical philosophy has dominated professional philosophy in English-speaking countries. When contrasted with "Continental" philosophy, analytical philosophy is often called "Anglo-American." Michael Dummett argues that this is a misnomer: "Anglo-Austrian" would be a more accurate label, for analytical philosophy arose in the same milieu as the principal rival school of phenomenology. Furthermore, the two schools have the same roots. By reexamining the similar origins of the two traditions, we can come to understand why they later diverged so widely, and thus take the first step toward reconciliation.
ABOUT THIS BOOK | REVIEWS | TOC
